No time limit at all. Instead, screens are excluded from places and moments: not at meals, not in bedrooms, not in the hour before bed, not in the car on short journeys. The claim is that the damage screens do is mostly displacement — of sleep, of conversation, of going outside — so protecting what they displace is more precise than rationing the screen itself.
What it asks of you
- Rules that bind the whole household, visibly, including the adults
- Holding the bedroom rule when every other family has stopped
- Accepting that the total will sometimes look alarming, because you are not counting it
Screens are simply not part of the house for the early years — usually until around seven, and the reasoning is developmental rather than about content. The argument is that young children build attention, imagination and boredom tolerance out of unmediated time, and that a screen is not a neutral container for good content but a different kind of hour. It is the only position here with no grey area to manage, which is both its cost and the whole of its appeal.
What it asks of you
- Absorbing every argument, because there is no partial version to fall back on
- A plan for the aeroplane, the waiting room and the illness — the three places it breaks
- Standing apart from every other household your child visits
- Adults who mostly follow it too, or the child learns the rule is about being small