No time limit at all. Instead, screens are excluded from places and moments: not at meals, not in bedrooms, not in the hour before bed, not in the car on short journeys. The claim is that the damage screens do is mostly displacement — of sleep, of conversation, of going outside — so protecting what they displace is more precise than rationing the screen itself.
What it asks of you
- Rules that bind the whole household, visibly, including the adults
- Holding the bedroom rule when every other family has stopped
- Accepting that the total will sometimes look alarming, because you are not counting it
Screen time is the household currency: earned by the things that need doing, removed when things go wrong. It is easily the commonest approach in practice and the least often defended in print, which is a gap rather than a verdict. It works, in the sense that it reliably moves behaviour, and the thing it teaches about screens is that they are the most valuable thing in the house.
What it asks of you
- A clear, stable list of what earns what, or it becomes a daily negotiation
- Willingness to follow through on removal when that will ruin the evening
- Accepting that contingency makes a thing more desirable, which is the mechanism working against you