RIE / respectful parenting

Slow down, narrate, and let them finish it themselves.

You treat a very small child as a person who is already competent, and you say what is happening before it happens. Play is uninterrupted and largely unhelped. You wait before stepping in — not because struggle is good for them, but because the struggle is usually theirs to finish. Praise is replaced by description, on the view that a child working out what they think of their own work should not be interrupted by what you think of it.

What it asks of you

Not what it promises

Every approach here works for the families it suits; the useful question is what it costs to run.

  • Slowness — a nappy change becomes a two-minute conversation
  • Sitting on your hands while something takes four times as long
  • Dropping "good job" as a reflex, which is harder than it sounds
  • A predictable enough day that a small child can anticipate it

How it gets misread

Often taken for coldness, because it does not rush in. Gerber's position is the opposite: full attention during care, and genuine non-interference outside it, rather than half attention spread across both.

Axis by axis

Where it stands

Every position with the source it was read from, and the pale band is how much internal variation the approach genuinely tolerates. A wide band is not vagueness — it means the texts in this family really do disagree with each other about that axis.

R1Response to distress
let them work through itstep in and settle them straight away

Deliberately mid-scale: RIE waits and observes, then responds fully. It is neither fast nor absent.

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

R2Behaviour or feeling
what they didwhat is underneath it

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

R3Physical closeness
their own space, earlycarried, close, sleeping near us

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

D1Structure
we take the day as it comesa predictable rhythm and clear rules

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

D2Who decides
we work it out with themthe adults decide, and explain

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

D3Consequences
no imposed consequences at allthe same consequence, every time

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

D4Praise and rewards
describing what is therepraising and rewarding freely

Source: Punished by Rewards

A1Doing it themselves
doing it for them while they are smallletting them do it badly, from early

The highest position on doing-it-themselves in the instrument, and the axis the approach is built around.

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

A2Risk
removing the hazardletting them meet it

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

A3Expectation
their own pace, no pushhigh expectations, and pushing

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

A4How full the week is
unstructured time, boredom is fineactivities, outings, things laid on

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

G1Where guidance comes from
instinct and observationresearch, books, a named method

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

G2Whose needs count
the child's needs come first, alwaysthe adults in the house count too

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

C1Consistency that can be heldwhat your life allows
it varies — by the day, and by who is onthe same line every time

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

C2Bandwidthwhat your life allows
running on emptyhaving room for this

Source: Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

Further

What to read

  • Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect — Magda Gerber

    Short, and the whole position is in it.

  • Elevating Child Care — Janet Lansbury

    The contemporary translation, organised by the situation you are actually stuck in.

Compared with

Sources for this row

  1. Dear Parent: Caring for Infants with Respect

    Magda Gerber, Resources for Infant Educarers, 2nd ed. 2002. Primary text for the RIE row, including the positions on uninterrupted play, observation before intervention, and describing rather than praising.

  2. Punished by Rewards

    Alfie Kohn, Houghton Mifflin, 1993. The argument against praise and reward systems that the D4 low pole is read from.

Find out which one you are already doing

Start